What if your tour guide didn’t merely know the history of a place—but had personally helped create the history you’re visiting?
That is the extraordinary proposition behind a controversial new tourism venture in Galicia, northwestern Spain, where former drug trafficker Laureano Oubiña is attempting to turn the locations associated with his criminal past into a commercial tourist experience.
At around 80 years old, after years behind bars and decades spent as one of the most recognizable figures associated with Galicia’s drug-trafficking history, Oubiña is now offering tourists a boat journey through parts of the Ría de Arousa where smuggling once took place.
The planned experience, marketed as a “Ruta del Narcotráfico” or narcotrafficking route, was advertised at approximately €189 per person. Oubiña himself was intended to serve as the guide, recounting his first-hand experiences of the tobacco and hashish smuggling networks that operated along Galicia’s coast.
But before the tour could fully get underway, authorities stepped in.
Galicia’s regional tourism authorities opened a sanctioning procedure and temporarily halted the initiative, saying the company behind the project was not authorized to sell tourism packages in the manner proposed. The issue was therefore not simply whether the subject matter was controversial; there was also a regulatory question over how the tour was being marketed and operated.
That distinction matters.
Because behind the headline-grabbing idea of a “drug-trafficking cruise” lies a much larger question:
Can a society turn the history of organized crime into tourism without glorifying the people who committed it?
Who Is Laureano Oubiña?
Laureano Oubiña became one of the best-known figures associated with Galicia’s organized-smuggling and drug-trafficking history.
His story is intertwined with the coastal communities of Pontevedra province, particularly the Ría de Arousa, an estuarine landscape where maritime smuggling historically played a major role.
Oubiña’s criminal career began with contraband involving tobacco before becoming associated with hashish and, later, cocaine trafficking.
He eventually became a major target of Spanish law enforcement.
His criminal history and subsequent imprisonment made him a recognizable figure in Spain’s long-running struggle against organized drug trafficking.
Reports surrounding the proposed tour describe him as having spent roughly three decades in prison and having been released after serving a lengthy sentence.
Today, he has moved into a very different kind of business.
Instead of hiding his past, he is selling access to it.
From Smuggling Routes to Tourist Routes
The concept is remarkably straightforward.
A boat leaves the Galician coast.
Passengers travel through locations associated with historical smuggling operations.
Oubiña tells stories about what happened there.
The itinerary reportedly includes around 15 locations around the Ría de Arousa, with places such as the island of Ons, the island of Cortegada, the port of O Grove and areas around the mouths of rivers including the Umia and Ulla featuring in the proposed experience.
The experience was designed as a full-day outing rather than simply a short boat trip.
Food and refreshments were part of the package, with reports describing breakfast, appetizers and lunch alongside the maritime journey.
The inaugural outing was planned for August 29, 2026, with capacity reportedly reaching as many as 150 passengers.
The product was therefore being positioned as a genuine tourism experience rather than a museum lecture.
And that is precisely what makes it controversial.
Why Would Anyone Pay €189 for This?
The obvious question is why tourists would pay nearly €200 to hear a former criminal describe his old smuggling routes.
The answer lies partly in the growing popularity of experiential tourism.
Modern travelers increasingly want something more unusual than conventional sightseeing.
Instead of simply visiting a monument, they want access to stories.
They want people with unusual experiences.
They want locations that feel authentic.
And increasingly, they want experiences they cannot easily reproduce on their own.
Oubiña offers something almost impossible to fake:
first-hand testimony.
A historian can explain how smuggling worked.
A police officer can describe the fight against organized crime.
A journalist can reconstruct the story.
But Oubiña can say, in effect:
“I was there.”
That creates an extraordinary marketing proposition.
It also creates an extraordinary ethical problem.
Galicia Has a Long and Complicated Relationship With Smuggling
To understand why this story resonates so strongly, it is necessary to understand Galicia’s geography.
The region has a long, irregular Atlantic coastline with deep estuaries known as rías.
The Ría de Arousa in particular contains numerous coves, islands, inlets and sheltered maritime areas.
Historically, these geographical characteristics provided ideal conditions for maritime commerce—and for smuggling.
Tobacco smuggling became particularly significant in parts of Galicia during the 20th century.
Smuggling networks could exploit the coastline’s complexity and the difficulty of monitoring every small boat and landing point.
Over time, some criminal networks moved beyond tobacco and hashish into far more lucrative and destructive drug trafficking.
That transformation would eventually help turn Galicia into one of Spain’s most important fronts in the fight against organized drug trafficking.
Tobacco Was Not the Same as Cocaine
One detail that can easily disappear in the sensational headlines is the distinction between different stages of Galicia’s smuggling history.
Tobacco smuggling existed before the region became notorious for cocaine trafficking.
Contraband tobacco was often treated differently by communities and even by some participants than narcotics.
The move from tobacco and hashish into cocaine represented a major escalation.
Cocaine generated enormous profits and created much more serious social consequences.
The history therefore isn’t simply:
“Galicia was full of drug dealers.”
It is a complicated evolution from traditional smuggling economies into increasingly sophisticated organized crime.
That history matters because it explains why some local residents may view Oubiña’s proposed tour very differently from an outsider.
For a tourist, it may sound like an extraordinary adventure.
For someone who lived through the period, it may represent a painful chapter.
The Human Cost Behind the “Adventure”
This is the strongest criticism of the project.
Organizations working with people affected by drug addiction and drug trafficking have argued that turning the history into entertainment risks trivializing the damage caused by narcotics.
The Galician organization Érguete, which has long worked on issues related to drug addiction, has criticized the initiative and argued that such tourism can banalize the suffering associated with drug trafficking.
And that criticism cannot simply be dismissed as opposition to tourism.
Drug trafficking isn’t an abstract historical curiosity.
It has produced addiction, family breakdown, violence, imprisonment, corruption and deaths.
For communities that experienced those consequences, hearing the former trafficker describe his old routes over lunch could feel less like historical education and more like commercialization of collective trauma.
That is the uncomfortable part.
Is It Crime Tourism?
The proposed route fits into a broader category sometimes called dark tourism.
Dark tourism involves travel to places associated with death, tragedy, disaster, war, genocide, crime or other difficult historical events.
Examples include former concentration camps, battlefields, disaster sites, prisons and locations associated with notorious crimes.
The category is controversial because motivations vary dramatically.
Some visitors want education.
Some want to understand history.
Others are attracted by the macabre.
And some simply want an unusual experience to post online.
The ethical question isn’t necessarily whether dark tourism should exist.
It is:
How should these places be presented?
A former prison can be interpreted as a lesson about justice and human suffering.
Or it can be marketed as a thrilling criminal playground.
Those are very different experiences.
Oubiña’s Tour Sits Right on That Boundary
The Galician narcotour occupies an unusual position because the person telling the story is not a neutral museum curator.
He was directly involved.
That creates both the tour’s greatest attraction and its biggest weakness.
His first-hand knowledge could make the experience historically fascinating.
But personal storytelling can also be selective.
A former criminal has his own memories, motivations, grievances and interpretation of events.
That doesn’t automatically make his testimony false.
It does mean it should be treated as one perspective rather than the entire historical record.
A responsible historical tourism experience would ideally place personal testimony alongside independent evidence, social history, law-enforcement records and the experiences of victims and affected communities.
Otherwise, the criminal’s story can become the story.
The Problem of the “Legend”
Oubiña has become something of a cultural character in Spain.
That phenomenon isn’t unique to him.
Societies have repeatedly transformed notorious criminals into celebrities.
There is an obvious commercial formula:
crime + notoriety + personality + exclusive access = marketable story.
Books can be sold.
Documentaries can be produced.
Television series can be made.
Merchandise can be created.
Tours can be organized.
Oubiña has already participated in several forms of commercial activity surrounding his public persona, including books and merchandise, according to reporting about the proposed tour.
The danger is that the criminal becomes more memorable than the consequences of the crime.
The trafficker becomes a character.
The victims become background.
That is where historical tourism can become historical mythmaking.
Galicia Has Other Stories to Tell
The controversy is particularly interesting because Galicia does not need organized crime to attract tourists.
The region already has enormous tourism assets.
There are Atlantic beaches, historic towns, seafood traditions, vineyards, pilgrimage routes, dramatic coastlines and protected islands.
Cambados, for example, is closely associated with Albariño wine and hosts major food and wine festivals.
The official Galician cultural calendar describes the Festa do Albariño as one of the region’s major events, attracting around 150,000 visitors over five days.
The area also includes destinations such as the Cortegada Island and other attractions within the Atlantic Islands ecosystem.
The official tourism infrastructure around Vilagarcía de Arousa promotes historic routes, food and wine tourism, beaches, the Camino de Santiago and island experiences.
In other words, Galicia already has plenty of compelling tourism narratives.
The narcotour isn’t filling a vacuum.
It is competing with—and potentially reshaping—the story visitors tell themselves about the region.
Why Authorities Halted the Tour
The legal issue is important because it is easy to assume authorities banned the tour simply because it glorifies drugs.
That isn’t what the available reporting shows.
Galician tourism inspectors opened a sanctioning procedure because the company organizing the experience, Pejurito S.L.U., was not authorized as a travel agency to offer the tourism package in the form proposed.
Galician tourism law requires certain packaged tourism services to be offered by appropriately registered agencies, and reported potential fines range from approximately €901 to €9,000 for the relevant violation.
Oubiña was reportedly given a period in which the project could potentially be regularized.
That distinction is crucial.
The authorities’ action was not necessarily a declaration that:
“A tour about drug trafficking is illegal.”
Rather, it was a regulatory objection to how the tourism product was being organized and sold.
The moral debate and the legal debate are therefore separate.
Could the Tour Still Happen?
As of the latest reports, the project had been temporarily halted while its legal situation was addressed.
Oubiña has reportedly remained determined to pursue the concept.
He has also discussed expanding the idea beyond the original Ría de Arousa route.
Potential future routes could explore other parts of Galicia and locations connected with his past, while reports have also mentioned his escape through Europe and eventual capture by Interpol.
That suggests the business concept is bigger than one boat trip.
It is an attempt to build an entire tourism brand around a criminal biography.
The Business Model Is Actually Quite Clever
Strip away the ethical controversy for a moment and the commercial logic is obvious.
The product has:
A famous guide.
A dramatic personal story.
A distinctive geographic setting.
A limited-capacity experience.
A high degree of exclusivity.
A media-friendly narrative.
A price point that reinforces its premium positioning.
The €189 ticket is not simply paying for transportation.
Customers are paying for access to a story they cannot obtain through an ordinary sightseeing cruise.
That is textbook experiential marketing.
The problem is that the experience being monetized is built around organized crime.
Could It Become a Historical Education Tool?
There is another way to look at the idea.
Perhaps the tour could become valuable if it were reframed.
Instead of:
“Come hear a famous trafficker tell you about his adventures.”
it could become:
“Come learn how Galicia’s smuggling economy evolved into organized drug trafficking—and what it did to the region.”
That second version is fundamentally different.
Oubiña’s testimony could still be central.
But it would be contextualized.
Visitors could learn about:
- tobacco smuggling
- maritime geography
- the rise of organized crime
- cocaine trafficking
- law enforcement
- addiction
- social consequences
- corruption
- prison
- rehabilitation
- the transformation of Galicia’s coastal communities
That could turn a sensational experience into serious historical tourism.
The question is whether the market would prefer the educational version.
Probably not as much.
And that is precisely the tension.
The Victim’s Perspective Cannot Be an Afterthought
Any serious attempt to commercialize this history should include the people who suffered because of the drug trade.
That could mean addiction specialists.
Families affected by drug-related deaths.
Former law-enforcement officers.
Journalists who investigated trafficking networks.
Researchers.
Community organizations.
Recovering addicts.
Their stories would complicate the narrative.
But that is exactly why they matter.
History becomes more credible when it contains competing perspectives.
A tour in which only the former trafficker gets to speak risks becoming autobiography with a boat ticket.
A tour that includes multiple perspectives could become genuinely educational.
The Tourism Industry Has a Reputation Problem
This case also illustrates a broader issue facing modern tourism.
Travel companies increasingly sell access, not simply destinations.
Visitors want access to celebrities.
Access to private homes.
Access to remote communities.
Access to behind-the-scenes experiences.
Access to people with unusual life stories.
That trend can be positive.
It can support local economies and create meaningful experiences.
But it can also create incentives to commercialize increasingly sensitive material.
Once something can be packaged, priced and sold, the market has a tendency to push boundaries.
A former drug trafficker offering a €189 tour is therefore not just an odd Spanish news story.
It is a particularly extreme example of a much wider phenomenon.
When Does History Become Entertainment?
This is the philosophical heart of the controversy.
Museums charge admission.
Historic sites sell tickets.
Prisons become tourist attractions.
Battlefields attract visitors.
Memorials sell books and souvenirs.
Holocaust museums have gift shops.
So commercialization itself does not automatically make historical tourism unethical.
The key issue is how the story is framed.
If the central message is:
“Look how exciting the criminal lifestyle was,”
the experience risks glorification.
If the message is:
“Understand how this criminal economy developed and what it did to society,”
the same locations can become educational.
The difference is not necessarily the location.
It is the narrative.
Galicia’s Reputation Is Also at Stake
There is another concern raised by the authorities: tourism is also about destination branding.
Galicia has spent years promoting itself through food, landscapes, heritage, wine, pilgrimage and coastal culture.
A narcotrafficking tour introduces a radically different brand identity.
That may attract attention.
But attention isn’t always the same thing as good tourism.
A destination has to decide what it wants to be famous for.
If international visitors begin associating the Ría de Arousa primarily with drug trafficking, the region could find itself trapped by the very story that generated publicity.
On the other hand, refusing to discuss the history doesn’t make the history disappear.
The smarter strategy may be to acknowledge the past while refusing to romanticize it.
The Strange Power of First-Hand Testimony
There is still something fascinating about Oubiña’s proposed role as a guide.
History often feels distant.
A textbook says:
“Smuggling networks operated along this coastline.”
A former participant says:
“This is where we used to operate.”
The emotional difference is enormous.
First-hand testimony can make history tangible.
It can also reveal details that official accounts miss.
But memory is not a perfect recording.
People remember selectively.
They reinterpret their own actions.
They may minimize responsibility.
They may exaggerate their importance.
They may turn their lives into stories.
That is why the strongest historical experiences don’t simply ask:
“Who was there?”
They ask:
“What does the evidence show?”
Could This Become a Global Trend?
Possibly.
The basic model could easily be replicated elsewhere.
Former gang members could offer neighborhood tours.
Former smugglers could lead border excursions.
Former pirates could narrate maritime routes.
Former spies could offer Cold War experiences.
Former prison inmates could guide visitors through notorious facilities.
Some already do variations of these things.
The commercial potential is obvious because authenticity is difficult to manufacture.
But the ethical risks are equally obvious.
Tourism can preserve memory.
It can also turn trauma into entertainment.
The difference depends on the people designing the experience.
The Most Important Question Isn’t Whether the Tour Is Shocking
It is tempting to focus on the absurdity of the story.
A former drug trafficker.
A boat.
His old smuggling routes.
€189 tickets.
Breakfast and lunch.
Tourists taking photographs.
It sounds almost like satire.
But the serious question is much bigger.
Who gets to control the story of a community’s criminal past?
The person who committed the crimes?
The victims?
The police?
Historians?
Journalists?
Local residents?
Or tourists willing to pay for the most entertaining version?
There is no easy answer.
A Possible Path Forward
If the tour eventually receives the necessary authorization, there is a strong argument for imposing clear ethical standards.
A responsible version could:
- clearly distinguish historical explanation from glorification;
- acknowledge victims and communities affected by drug trafficking;
- provide independent historical context;
- avoid romanticizing criminal wealth or violence;
- explain the consequences of addiction;
- include law-enforcement perspectives;
- use verified historical information alongside personal testimony;
- respect local communities;
- avoid presenting trafficking as an adventure lifestyle.
That could turn controversy into something meaningful.
It could even become a case study in how difficult history can be presented responsibly.
The Future of Galicia’s Narcotour
For now, the future of Oubiña’s tourism venture remains uncertain because of the regulatory problems surrounding its launch.
But the idea has already succeeded at one thing:
getting people to talk about Galicia’s past.
That may be the most valuable part of the story.
Galicia’s smuggling history should neither be erased nor romanticized.
It is part of the region’s modern history, and understanding it helps explain social, economic and political changes that continue to influence the region.
The challenge is deciding how to tell that story.
A former trafficker may have an extraordinary story to tell.
But he should not be the only voice.
The Final Destination Should Be History, Not Hype
There is nothing inherently wrong with confronting a dark past.
In fact, societies need to do it.
The danger begins when suffering becomes a marketing gimmick and criminals become celebrities without context.
Oubiña’s proposed €189 cruise sits precisely on that fault line.
It could become a sensationalized celebration of a notorious figure.
Or, handled differently, it could become a difficult but valuable lesson about how smuggling evolved into organized crime and how that transformation affected Galicia.
The boat route itself is not the most important thing.
The story told aboard it is.
And perhaps the best version of this tourism experience would leave visitors with something more complicated than a good photograph and an outrageous anecdote.
It would leave them understanding that behind every legendary smuggler, every secret landing place and every romantic story of contraband, there were real people who paid the price.
That is the history worth remembering.
Sources EL PAIS
